Healthcare Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Healthcare - Essay Example This paper shall now consider the debate regarding the objectivist and constructivist concepts of health and illness. It shall argue for the acceptance of one philosophical account over the other. It shall provide an analysis, comparison, and evaluation of both theories in relation to health and illness. This study is being carried out in the hope of establishing a thorough and comprehensive understanding of these theories in relation to health and illness. Discussion The current trends in philosophical thinking have focused on defining disease concepts as those which involve experiential assessments on human physiology and on human behavior and well-being (Bloomfield, 2001). First and foremost, people have beliefs about the normal functioning of their bodies based on their natural and logical expectations of physiology. Secondly, people make generalizations about how a way or condition of life is true or not. These generalizations are based on normative principles which are concerne d with the â€Å"extent to which a life is unnatural, undesirable or failing to flourish in some way† (Murphy, 2008). A crucial issue is on the judgments which people make about their physiology and whether they are also considered normative. A bigger question is on the impact of both judgments in the scientific field of medicine and in simple matters of common sense. A dilemma unearthed in understanding health and illness is the fact that our usual and traditional judgments determine who are considered ill or diseased. Such traditional views have not created as much impact on philosophy, but they have registered a significant impact in other areas, including humanities and social sciences (Kennedy, 1983). Some objectivists believe that there are details about the human physiology upon which the concept of diseases is founded. But constructivists point out that this is a major deception. Instead, these constructivists point out that the disputed cases indicate how the differe nt beliefs of social groups come into conflict with each other, and agreements are sometimes ensured because the system of values have been generally accepted (Murphy, 2008). Kitcher has been one of the first who has considered the objectivism and constructivism concepts in healthcare (Sarkar and Plutynski, 2010). These two theories have also been referred to as naturalism and normativism. Kitcher’s analysis is based on unclear facts about the human body. It is therefore crucial to create definite generalizations for objectivism and constructivism. First and foremost, the objectivist understanding of disease is that our human body is made up of different organs which have normal functions upon which they can depart in different ways (Murphy, 2008). These departures can either be harmless or sometimes harmful to humans. Those which are harmful manifest as diseases. A disease in this understanding is therefore based on normal functioning of the body and a general judgment of a result being something ‘abnormal’ or a departure from the natural. Objectivists believe that establishing the presence of a disease is a matter for science and that normative evaluations are the foundations of such judgment (Boorse, 1997). In effect, the objectivists believe that disease is a physiological malfunction which causes a life to deteriorate. Such a malfunction can manifest in different ways. Diseases may not be of the natural kind, but they

Relationship of Regionalism and Globalism Essay

Relationship of Regionalism and Globalism - Essay Example This research will begin with the statement that there is a growing debate whether firms should use globalism or regionalism as their chosen approach. Globalism of a business indicates their international integration through the interchange of products, worldviews, cultural aspects, and ideas.   International marketing principle influence companies to have a consistent global strategy when they are operating internationally but they also need to adopt different tactical approaches to successfully operate in their targeted local market. On the other hand regionalization of a business explains the process of dividing the large market into small regional segments and formulating the product and ideas as per the difference in regional demand and cultural aspects. A very well known approach by multinational companies for their global strategy is to think globally and act locally. This view has been adopted by a large number of Multinational organizations and it has been proven as a succ essful theory. Various researchers have proven that a debate over the usage of adaptation and standardization in any organization commenced in the year of 1961. After half a century the debate is still on. Various arguments have shown that regionalism of any organization can be better than the globalism strategies. Globalism promotes communication across the borders and helps an organisation to successfully satisfy the requirement of consumers and market. This process involves changes in political and economic spheres of any organization. It also helps in bringing the world together. Researchers argue that the basis of the globalization of any organization is to compare the market operation in the home market with the operations in the foreign market. They also have mentioned that global standardization helps organizations to operate at a low production cost. It also helps them to treat the entire world as a single market and sell the similar product in the same way everywhere. Seve ral factors help an organization in the selection of their globalism strategies and tactics.